Week 12: Red Dawn

Dear Avid Reader,

Art imitates reality imitates art. Chicken and the egg. You dig what I'm putting down. I can tell.

Tell Me What's The Difference Between Us And Them

An action movie rarely mirrors life. Usually a dude or group o' dudes takes on a huge army and overcomes using controlled explosions and snappy one liners. There are few examples of this actually happening. And I find it hilarious that our action movies cast the scrappy band of insurgents as heroes and the large advanced army as the villains. I guess maybe we should have blamed the unrest in Iraq on movies like Red Dawn.

And why single out Red Dawn? Because it is a movie that I remember watching as a kid and taking it in as a how-to-film. No seriously. I didn't watch it as much as study it. The thought was not IF the Russians (or anyone) was going to attack, but WHEN. In the initial hours of the invasion, children needed to run away and gather as much supplies as you could. Then setting up camp was vital. And all survivors who made it for a month or so, MUST start a counter attack from behind enemy lines. Never surrender. What happened to my childhood Patrick Swayze? You stole it!

All That Hate's Gonna Burn You Up, Kid.

The characters showed a young generation that they could be extraordinarily successful at harassing the enemy with lightning raids. They used the familiar woods to their advantage, and set traps and stole equipment. And what kid wouldn't want to be in a Red Dawn scenario? No parents, calling your own shots, shooting guns, fighting for...something...America, maybe? Hey why are we killing all these people Pony-Boy*?

*Watch "The Outsiders" to get that joke.

The youngsters in the movie go Lord of the Flies and start slaying people real early in the movie. Why is this? Easy, the adults are too lazy/smart/dumb/awful-human to fight and they get the kids to do it for them. And they start working on the kids early. Mr. Morris is the first adult they meet and he gives them guns and tells them to never come back. Mr. Mason gives them more weapons and gives Jed the impression that he is able to care for his girls. He even tells him that he is a famous "leader". All of this is very attractive to the boys. They so want to please these men, that they are literally willing to die for them.

The Chair Is Against The Wall, John Has A Long Mustache

The prime moment is when does Mr. Eckert screams "Avenge Me". This is the most selfish thing to tell anyone. I'm about to die but I want to die knowing that someone else is gonna die. And this is all after he tells them that his brutal parenting style was to prepare them for this moment of invasion. This post is starting to have shades of The Cowboys post. I'll move on.

Now that the kids are fully brainwashed, they solidify into a very lethal strike force. But in addition to showing kids how to prepare for fights and surviving off the land/enemy, Red Dawn also prepare the viewer for the harsh realities of guerrilla warfare. Don't trust someone claiming to be a friendly solider right off the bat. Turn your grief into rage. Violence is your new therapy. Shoot traitors, period. Never leave a wounded squad member behind, in fact, kill them if you have to. Discipline is king. And it's O.K. to give a woman a gun...it's an emergency after all.

Wolverines!

This is why Red Dawn stands out as an action movie. It is fiction that tries to impact the reality of the audience. It isn't simply entertainment. Red Dawn tries to get the viewer to ask if they are prepared for an invasion. And if they aren't prepared, then the movie provides the novice with what World War III might look like. It will be hard, it will be tough, but in the end America will win through perserverance and loyalty to the Grand Ole Flag. Just sacrifice your life and your grave rock will be turned into a national park.

And isn't the promise of glory after death the best way to recruit martyrs?

Until Next I Blog,

James

P.S. Nice move stoking the fear of Gun Rights Activists by having the enemy use the gun registry to track down the gun owners and kill them. I thought that was hilarious.

Week 11: The Longest Yard

Dear Avid Reader,

Or should I just write, "What's up Jordan?"

It is so easy to get behind on this, but I'm fighting back.

Shaving Points Off Of A Football Game, Man That's Un-American

In an another movie, "The Devil's Advocate", the Devil says that his favorite sin is vanity. Vanity/pride is very tricky because it can be kinda sneaky. It can be the ninja of attributes. Because sometimes, just sometimes, what is clearly pride is named virtue. Oh yeah, that is some straight up assassin shit right there.

Paul "Ridiculous Nickname" Crewe is the embodiment of this. See Paul is a bad-ass. This makes him very likable. The way he just doesn't care. It's really attractive. Paul just casts off the beautiful woman that presumably keeps him as a man of pleasure. And rather than find contentment in the arms of carnal pleasure and the wealth that has come so easy to him, he pushes it all aside to become his own man. Whatever that means. He's a total jerk. He's a real asshole. In other words, he's the dream of men everywhere.

You've Only Got Two Things Left They Can't Sweat Out Of You Or Beat Out Of You

After his arrest and sentencing the movie is one clash of macho pride after the other. The Captain that won't relinquish control of the semi-pro guard team. The warden that needs a win in order to validate himself. The prisoners that want to hit the guards out of frustration over being jailed. The black prisoners who eventually join the team after Granny is humiliated in the prison library. The answer to every problem is giving into your pride, never backing down. This is why there is still war in the world.

And the biggest moment, the lesson of the movie, is when Pop reveals that punching the warden was worth a life sentence in jail. This of course is ridiculous. This means that you can do whatever you want so long as you accept the consequences. But that is a really awful philosophy in practice. What about when schoolyard fights escalate into gun violence? What about when getting cut-off results in road rage? What if Pop killed the warden? Would he still be thought of as endearing?

But Burt Reynolds is still a bad ass. This movie is still awesome because the underdogs overcome the bully guards. But I'm left conflicted. I mean some of these people are in jail because they are bullies themselves. These are criminals after all. Maybe they need some humility. Maybe the best thing for them would have been to lose that game.

For Nate, For Granny... For Caretaker

What is the point of this analysis? I'm not sure anymore. I started out with this really great idea, but it has gotten away from me. I guess lately I haven't been as funny in the posts as I have been in the past. That kinda sucks. Maybe I'm just in a low place personally.

Maybe it's because I hate bullies so much and this movie lightly hints at that issue for me. I want to expose that being an ultra macho, never back down guy is really dumb. It leads to pointless fighting. Rather than attack, all of these characters have a moment when they should have asked themselves, "Is this really worth it."

It's not. For me Pops, it's not worth it.

Until Next i Blog,

James

Week 10: The Cowboys

Dear Avid Reader,

Ugh. More writing. Are you even reading this? Who cares. I'm writing it anyways.

Geez I'm a real downer today. Moving on.

He's Quiet...It Just Comes Out Loud

What is it about fathers? Dads are funny and cool. But when it comes to one's own father, isn't there a little bit of resentment. Maybe even hate?

John Wayne is often blamed for the emotional withdrawal of the American father. I tend to agree with this. Look no further than this week's film. Wil Andersen is a big believer in the "tough love" school of parenting. And viewers typically get a sense that they are supposed to find this endearing. This is because the kids rally around his death and steal the cattle back from Long-Haired Dan. I think they were just worried about not getting paid.

Alright! We've Seen What You Can Do With A Boy, How Are You When They Come A Little Bigger?

Viewers shouldn't gloss over of the fact that Wil's actual children turned out to be "bad". This should give viewers pause. Even Wil admits that he might have failed them in some way. So we see that being tough is cool, so long as it is is for a month, and as an employee. It's when someone has to put up with it for an entire childhood, it kinda pisses them off. And it doesn't even teach you how to be "good", you turn out "bad". Face it, acting like John Wayne makes for a sucky parent.

There is a notion that tough love is some how good. But what is "tough love"? Let's define it, at least for parenting. The worst way I can describe it is that the parent acts straight up distant and cold, like Wil Andersen in the movie. Only showing small hints of having a warm-blooded heart. The best way I can describe it is being nice to a child until they break the rules. Then the parent MUST punish them and become an entirely mean person. It's "for their own good". But isn't that the way an employer treats an employee? Or how a cop treats a driver at a traffic stop? Isn't "for your own good" the reason that TSA gives for having to touch an air-traveler's swimsuit area?

Tough love advocates will say this definition is too simplistic, but I say it is accurate. And if they don't like my spanking by essay, then they can sit in the time out corner. Don't make me take my literary belt off.

Slap Some Bacon On A Biscuit And Let's Go! We're Burnin' Daylight!

Let's try some emotional appeal. When a parent dies do they want the following scenario?

Scene opens in a church, at a funeral. A middle-aged man walks to the podium. He looks at the open casket. The body of his father lies peacefully within. The man clears his throat and grips the podium. "My father, was a man. And above all else he expected us to be disciplined. And that is what I will remember most, his corrections. No one here could say they had a more fair or more professional father than I did. That is all." The middle-aged man walks slowly back to his pew and grips his wife's hand and cautions his own children about being disruptive in a church. Scene.

Parenting shouldn't be results based. A family isn't a company. Looking at an offspring's manners or good behavior as the chief criteria for success is dumb. It basically means that the parent is most interested in how the child is perceived by others because the offspring is a reflection of themselves. And that is, to put it eloquently, bullcrap.

Boys Are Always Guilty Of Something Nasty. What Could It Be This Time, I Wonder?

When Wil dies, he looks into the eyes of the children and tells them, that they are better than he is. He could have been encouraging them the whole cattle drive but withheld his kind words to make them hard for a harder world. In fact, in the case of Stuttering Bob, he humiliates the kid for having a speech disorder. Seriously?

But why does he relent at the end? It's because he realizes there, as life is ebbing away, what a total asshole he has been. He wants to try and go back on a lifetime of holding his loved ones at arm's length. A lifetime spent grinding rather than loving. He becomes scared. He realizes that his legacy is one of pain.

Why didn't he yield? Why didn't he accept the people closest to him even though they made mistakes? Maybe the mistakes weren't that bad. No, of course they weren't. Are his sons near? Maybe he could apologize now. No, they are long gone. They finally left him, weary from being being told they didn't measure up.

But, he was only thinking of them, right. Couldn't they see that by pushing them away he was preparing them for the cruelty they were to face after they left home? Only, now does he realize that he was taking away the only refuge someone has in the harsh reality of gowning up. He took away their home. Home became the harsh world. He turned it into a place that was not a sanctuary, but just another place they we going to be disappointed. Another place that they were excluded. Wil prepared them, all to well.

Big Mouth Don't Make A Big Man

But these kids, these cowboys that surround him now. They will remember Wil. Wil wants to change. He wants these boys to know that he is proud of them. Like Ebeneezer Scrooge, he wants a second chance. He sees the light, the error of his ways. These kids will receive all the goodness that Wil's sons never received.

But alas, it's too late. One line can't reverse the hurricane of "tough love" that Wil devoted his whole life to churning. And breaking and showing a softness here as he is dying is truly the weakest thing he can do. It proves that he wasn't brutalizing these people for them, he was doing it for himself. At this crucial moment, he looks in the face of his life and he blinks.

The casket is closed Wil. No take backs.

Until Next I Post,

James

Week 9: The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly

Dear Avid Reader,

Today it's hard for me to come up with an angle. I kinda have half of an idea.

Why am I telling you this?

When You Have To Shoot, Shoot. Don't Talk

First off, Blondie isn't necessarily "good". The guy double-crosses Tuco, tricks lawmen with his collect the reward scheme, and he kills folks. He's kind of moral in that he feels disgust over the deaths of Civil War soldiers, but he's hardly ethical. Now I know ethics and morals are essentially the same thing, but for this post I am making a distinction. Watch me use my posting kung-fu.

Here are the definintions for this post. Morals will mean inherent goodness: Empathy, compassion, a fairness. Ethics, for this posting, will refer to rule-following: Laws, decorum, an obedience.

People With Ropes Around Their Necks Don't Always Hang

So when we see Blondie we see a man who is willing to break some rules but still has a "code". In addition to the fallen soldiers, he shows emotion when the Union Captain is wounded at the bridge. He expresses regret when Shorty is hung. He has a goodness. But he is a bandit. He steals and kills in order to survive. He also has a badness.

Angel Eyes is much easier to define. The dude is definitely "bad". He robs and kills just like the others, but there is something different about him. It's that he has no code. He tortures, he manipulates, he doesn't care about the soldiers that he works with dying. Angel Eyes has neither ethics or morals. And he loves every minute of it.

The World Is Divided In To Two Kinds Of People...

So obviously Tuco is some combination of the two. He tortures Blondie in the desert. He allows Shorty to die even though Blondie could have saved him. But he also wants to reconcile with his brother. I could go on, but I feel like you could fill in the blanks here. The guy is both good and bad.

And I think this is where we reside mostly, even though thought repulses us. But we don't want to be Tuco in the movie because we want to be good people, it's because Tuco is bullied by the other two. He gets beaten for information that he eventually gives up. Blondie isn't even touched because Angel Eyes knows it Blondie will never break. But with Tuco, Tuco will break. Tuco is weak.

Tuco he even gives up the goods to Blondie, and Blondie doesn't lay a finger on him. Blondie also steals Tuco's bullets while he's asleep. Tuco always seems to be a step behind. He gets the drop on Blondie, but Blondie quickly regains the upper hand in the relationship. Is it Tuco's bad luck, or is he just bad at being a bandit?

Canon Fire Or Storm It's All The Same To You

I think folks are willing to accept the fact that we are morally ambiguous like Tuco, but they are slower to admit that they are just as vulnerable as Tuco. Not hardened like Angel Eyes, able leaving people weak and afraid. Not as compassionate as Blondie, and thereby leaving his insight out of reach. We are blind and groping in the dark, powerless.

But as humanity collectively stands on the tombstone, rope around our neck, we know that the "good" will show pity on us. But that doesn't make us any less angry about our impotence to change the predicament. We still scream and curse the one who saved us. Out of jealousy, out of ignorance, out of madness, the music rising to cut us off.

This post is kinda depressing. AND it was like pulling teeth to write it. I guess I'm distracted this week. I'll try for more funny stuff next time.

Until Next I Blog,

James

Week 8: Enter The Dragon

Dear Avid Reader,

Sometimes folks would rather have things simple. But things are never simple. They're complicated.

I'm going to try and complicate Enter The Dragon for you now.

Don't Concentrate On The Finger Or You Will Miss All That Heavenly Glory

Here's the problem: the world has no supervillians. But the world needs supervillains, powerful, evil, and brilliant masters of destruction. They need to laugh with "MU-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA". That's right. We need people that start their laughs with "MU".

See, the universe needs folks like Han from Enter the Dragon. A dude that somehow got a bunch of money (I'm guessing a government grant). Someone who's ambitious, smart, and can hold his own in a fight. Han is all of these classically super-villianous things including a mind twisted to the brink of madness. I think that because he never fully recovered mentally from the accident that took his hand, he feels compelled to dominate the world out of an insecurity that he is no longer a whole man. So rather than get a nice prosthetic hand, the guy slaps fur on a garden hoe, then straps the grotesque contraption on his gnarled stump to slice folks in the face. In other words, he's a perfect supervillian.

Very Few People Can Be Totally Ruthless

Like all supervillians you can't go after Han directly. Sure you know every crime he's committed, but you lack evidence. He's just that good. So you have to send a guy in to infiltrate his organization and bring him down from the inside. Someone with a personal beef with the criminal-genius and also someone who has legendary butt kicking skills. Don't worry there's always a guy like that around. The Hans of the world are always killing the person that turns out to be the father of a loose cannon in the special forces. Or the daughter of a boxer that hung up his gloves after he killed an opponent in the ring. Supervillians always go one step too far. This time it was attempting to rape the sister of a spiritual kung-fu dude that...does...kung-fu...and...wait, does Lee have a job or anything? I think he's basically homeless.

Something else that troubles me is how does Han, and other supervillians, get awesome henchmen like O'Hara and Bolo? I mean. I don't think they get days off. Sure they get all of the comforts of the secret island, but what f they wanted to start a family? And what about when they get old? I don't think Han would allow them to retire. They probably have to keep henchmen-ing until they die. I think henchmen need a union. I don't think anyone is looking out for them.

Boards Don't Hit Back

So here's why the world needs supervillians. It's because it is getting harder and harder to tell who the bad guys are anymore. Han makes heroin, kidnaps the poor and conducts experiments on them, kills chicks in his harem for fun, and kills his guards when they make a mistake. He's a terrible human. It's easy to hate him.
But in reality, is it so easy to find the bad guys? It's election season, let's look through that spectrum. When does a political attack ad change from spin into lie? Here in Texas, I saw an ad that accused an opponent of allowing Texas to have one of the highest sales-tax in the country. But the thing is that Texas has no state income tax. And because taxes have to come from somewhere, Texas has higher property and sales tax. It's not anyone's fault, it's just the way it is. So was this a lie, or just stating the facts with a creepy dude's voice?

You Can Call It "The Art Of Fighting Without Fighting"

The truth is complicated. The thought is that the truth is simple because lies traditionally exaggerate or fabricate. But leaving out parts of the truth is also lying. Or is it? I don't know what to call it. I just know it's bullcrap.

If there was an alternative to having people in charge of things (like letting robots or gnomes take a crack at it), maybe things would work out better. The problem is that flawed, imperfect, gross, regular people are all there is to turn to. Even the heroes of Enter the Dragon are flawed. Lee gets captured by Han's trap, which means he can be careless. Williams and Roper are hustlers and womanizers (and one questions Roper's fighting ethics when he bites Bolo's leg). Are these the only people to count on to defeat evil. Unfortunately, the answer is yes.

Destroy The Image And You Will Break The Enemy

But if we had supervillians, then deciding who to fight would be a cinch. There would be no question as to if this was "right"or "wrong". Just look at the dude's house. It's a freaking island fortress complete with a booby-trapped dungeon-maze that's loaded with brawlers in white gis. Look, they're all punching in formation. Put the protest signs down.

But alas, the world is more sophisticated than that. Every day wrought with ethical dilemma. Such is life in the richest country in the world. But I can still dream right?

Yes, I can dream of a world filled with supervillians. I'm doing it right now.

Until Next I Blog,

James

Week 7: Donnie Darko

Dear Avid Reader,

Can a movie be awesome even though you hate it? I say yes. This is because I've seen Donnie Darko.

Go Home And Tell Your Parents Everything's Gonna Be O.K.

Donnie Darko is a terrible movie. Now I wonder if I hate this movie because it is truly awful, or because it was made for teenagers after I was no longer a teenager. Did I simply become a fuddy-duddy at 22? Maybe teenagers of this generation just like awful movies. That sounds like something a fuddy-dudy would say. These dumb teenagers and their dumb awful movies made me sound like a fuddy-duddy.

I'm going to stop typing fuddy-duddy right now.

Every Living Creature On Earth Dies Alone

Here's why I don't like the film. Everyone in the film is some form of unlikeable a-hole. The End.

Let's use Donnie as an example. Donnie is a troubled misanthrope that can't decide if he has a heart of gold or is full of rage at an unsatisfying world. He defends Cherita at the bus stop, but is a total, unjustifiable brat to his mom. He is kind to Gretchen but he is vicious to his sisters. He bullies the teachers at his school but is in turn bullied by fellow students. Donnie has it both ways. Now some might say that the character has complexity, but I disagree. He's just an unlikeable a-hole.

See, the duality isn't given nuance. Rather it relies on tropes that are all smashed together. Here are some more of the movie's smashed up tropes:

- Predominately white suburban neighborhood appears to be happy and wealthy but underneath is spiritually unfulfilling.
- Intellectual family at center of movie feels under attack from stupid and politically conservative members of community.
- Psychiatrist that pushes for more medication.
- Lone teacher who "gets" art is embattled with conservative school administration.
- Spiritual leader that is big on traditional values but has secret, deviant, sexual proclivities.
- Pop culture conversation that inserts a depth to a TV show/movie/song that reframes the work in a funny/interesting light.

Wait, I do that last one all the time. I'm doing it right now. Ignore the last line.

Why Do You Wear That Stupid Bunny Suit?

The problem isn't that the tropes are used, it's the feeling I get from them. The movie's seams are jagged and crooked. I feel like I've seen this movie before only better. There are attempts at originality, like with the time travel thing (TTT).

Now, I like the TTT, but if you start reading blog posts about it, hardcore fans seem to think that it is some huge, really deep aspect of the film. Like there is something more to it that what is offered. But there isn't, it's real simple. I'll explain. Donnie can see the immediate future through the cool, chest special effect. Frank helps Donnie understand that what he is experiencing from the plane crash on is life if he decides to live as opposed to die in the crash. He is given a the choice to sacrifice himself or Gretchen. He chooses himself. See, simple stuff. I mean this is all covered in It's A Wonderful Life. And George Bailey did act like a douche to everyone.

Time's Up Frank Said

And the TTT leads to the dumbest conversation in the movie. The one between Dr. Monnitoff and Donnie later in the movie, the second one they have. The one where we start to get into how the TTT works that ends when Monnitoff says that continuing it will cause him to get fired. Fired. For talking theoretical science. Seriously? Talking about time travel? That doesn't make any sense. Even the most backwards administration wouldn't fire the guy for talking about what is basically science fiction.

Or maybe the worst conversation is between Pomeroy and the principal when she gets fired. You know, the one where she gives her impassioned plea for the welfare of the students, minus the passion. The one where no clear reason for the firing is offered not because it's been a long time coming from constant fighting with the school leaders, but because the writer is lazy. The one where it looks like Drew is reading her lines out of a script in her lap. I hate this movie.

Sometimes I Doubt Your Commitment To Sparkle Motion

What really bugs me about the flick is that it feeds into the belief that negative people are smarter or better than people that are positive. Mrs. Pomeroy and Donnie spend the entire flick hatin', and they are the heroes of the movie. This just infuriates me. Why are the most condescending characters getting top billing? It's because it's such an easy tactic: being critical means you are more authentic, more honest.

And no one exemplifies this more than Donnie. He acts as the untouchable judge, the administrator of justice against hypocrisy, throughout the flick. But he isn't perfect. He isn't above everyone. He's just a kid with an attitude and psychological problems that has a penchant for needling community leaders publicly. Try getting elected judge with that wacky resume.

But here's the thing, the opposite is also true. It's just as honest to look for the cool things about something as it is for the lame things. It's just as authentic to say something is good as it is to say it's bad. It's also more fun to be raving about stuff. And I realize the irony of bashing a movie for an essay and then saying that it's wrong to bash things. Or is it not irony but hypocrisy? Idiocy? I hate this movie.

What's Cellar Door?

But I love this movie for one thing. At the talent show Cherie does the angel dance and all of the characters clap loudly for her. Now while some jerks scream jeers, the others just clap louder. That's what I'm talking about. We need more of that. Maybe I like this movie. I'm conflicted. Are there other cool parts? Now that I think about, there are. The school montage set to Tears for Fears early in the movie is the greatest sequence ever. It rules! It's better than the actual video for "Head Over Heels". ALL the music in the flick is great. Yeah. I'm starting to feel good about Donnie Darko.

Nah, I really hate this movie. It's an awesome movie that I hate. I'm not going to explain how that is possible. You're just going to have to go with it.

Until Next I Blog,

James

P.S. I ask "Is that Seth Rogen?" everytime he comes on-screen too.

Week 6: Scarface

Dear Avid Reader,

So Scarface is about capitalism. Let's get that out of the way. It is also the most awesome movie ever. You can't get out of the way of that. So let's just talk about the capitalism.

Lesson Number One: Don't Underestimate The Other Guy's Greed

Here's the thing about the capitalism allegory of Scarface: it shows capitalism as the awful reality of the American Dream. Tony grows up in Cuba idolizing the movie stars of Hollywood, claiming that he always knew that one day he would go to America. And why did he want to come here? Prosperity. Security. In a word, money.

When individuals talk about the American Dream, I wonder what they think that means. I guess the hokey, Pollyanna version is a life that is comfortable and secure. Chickens in pots, cars in garages and et cetera are included. The American Dream also means some kind of contentment, but that contentment seems to be conditional (or only come after) on getting the house, vacations days, and wireless internet access. The focus is on the material.

Nothing Exceeds Like Excess

This is why Scarface is such an awesome movie. It cuts to the heart of our true beliefs and fears. Tony works hard to get money. He is ruthless. He'll kill anyone that he needs to kill. He makes no bones about it. He's honest about what is happening. This honesty is what makes him an appealing character. He takes what he wants, but never lies about what he's doing to get it. He is a truly ethical capitalist.

And isn't that what every American wants? To drop their guilt? Don't we want our consumption to also be virtuous. I mean that's why we buy Tom's Shoes. In the back of every American's mind, they are just a few decisions away from being super rich. But they also fear they are a couple bad decisions away from been poor. It's what drives the economy. It's why we buy iPhones.

Scarface reminds the viewer that greed has consequences. That greed hurts someone. Tony kills people. His drug business has a terrible influence on his sister. The unchecked greed destroys Tony and everyone around. Scarface also reminds how fleeting the good times are. The movie spends a lot of time on the rise of Tony and on the fall of Tony. The small time that he enjoys his wealth can be fit in a montage.

Me, I Always Tell The Truth, Even When I Lie

I find one of the most honest scenes in the movie to be when Tony is negotiating the interest rate with the banker that is laundering his money. Sure he is bringing in more and more money, but in order for the money to be of use, he must pay more and more. Tony is faced with the reality that wealth cannot defy gravity. It is something that rich people face all the time: Growth that lasts forever does not exist. The American Dream is something you wake from.

But the most terrifying part of Scarface is the scene when Tony shoots Alberto during the NYC hit. Tony asserts himself. There are some things he just will not do in order to maintain his wealth. He knows that folks call him a "bad guy" but he truly believe that he isn't. Everyone else is just as bad, maybe more so because he doesn't hide his failings. But as soon as he takes a stand to rescue his soul, the system move quickly to remove him. Tony has now become the biggest threat to the system. He values himself above the game.

Is This It? That's What It's All About, Manny? Eating, Drinking...Snorting...Then What?

Tony's death is the realization of the fear for every rider on the roller coaster of American materialism. If at some point, if the rider wants off, will they stop the ride and let you go? When it comes time to want an identity of you own creation, will the collective strike back? Does the person that bought in get to cash out?

Yes, greed has consequences, profound, huge, big stinking consequences, and they are not that nice to think about. That something that individuals are so interwoven into could be destroying so much. Materialism is about a fear of death, and everyone is scared. Humanity just cannot move past this, still looking for the immortality application on our smart phone. But maybe it is not too late. Maybe there is something, however painful, that can right the course. Maybe it is time to say "hello" to a little friend. A little friend name "Conscience".

But it may as well be a grenade.

Until Next I Blog,

James